Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Kimi K2 0905

Kimi K2 0905 leads GPT-3.5 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 15.3 to 5.5, and GPT-3.5 Turbo costs 1.7x less per output token ($1.50 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
Kimi K2 0905Moonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

GPT-3.5 Turbo or Kimi K2 0905: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
3
GPT-3.5 Turbo only
10
Kimi K2 0905 only
14
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked, Kimi K2 0905 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 47.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-3.5 Turbo 29.7% against Kimi K2 0905 76.7%, 47.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 against Kimi K2 0905 $2.50 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo takes 16K tokens, Kimi K2 0905 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-3.5 TurboBarsKimi K2 0905Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Knowledge01
All shared boards03
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
AA Coding Index10.7Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured61.0%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.5%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
WeirdMLNot measured36.7%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured267.1Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
AA Intelligence Index5.515.3Kimi K2 0905
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured73.4%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
GPQA Diamond30.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.7%76.7%Kimi K2 0905
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.4%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured52.2%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured57.3Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.3%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
GSM8K57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)64.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)58.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%81.9%Kimi K2 0905
MMLU68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1088Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1098Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
IFBenchNot measured41.7%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured53.0%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
DTBench48.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMCA9.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured66.7%Only Kimi K2 0905 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 TurboKimi K2 0905Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request
Kimi K2 0905$0.0019Fits in one request

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window
Kimi K2 0905$0.037Fits in one request

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window
Kimi K2 0905$0.145Fits in one request

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo and Kimi K2 0905
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 TurboMoonshotAI Kimi K2 0905
MakerOpenAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 28, 2023September 4, 2025
Context window16K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.50$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.50$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo better than Kimi K2 0905 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.50 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Kimi K2 0905?

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 0905 costs $0.60 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo or Kimi K2 0905?

Kimi K2 0905, with 262K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Kimi K2 0905 comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-3.5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2 0905's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next