Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

GLM 5V Turbo leads Qwen3.6 35B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 18.2, and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 4.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
2
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
5
vs boards won of 7 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
7
GLM 5V Turbo only
58
Qwen3.6 35B A3B only
13
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 5.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GLM 5V Turbo 23.5 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B 18.2, 5.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsQwen3.6 35B A3BTies
Coding01
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning02
General02
All shared boards25
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured41.9Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
SciCodeNot measured36.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%34.8%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Terminal-BenchNot measured24.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
WeirdMLNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.518.2GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.7Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured13.1Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1060Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1126Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%95.3%GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%84.1%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%22.2%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1230Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1210Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1218Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1202Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1208Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1227Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1116Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
IFBench61.1%64.4%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%71.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
DTBenchNot measured73.9%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMCANot measured29.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured44.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1431Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboQwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerZ.aiQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window203K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.10
Output $/Mtok$4.00$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B, with 262K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.6 35B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next