Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Phi 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 33 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
23.5
Output $/M
$4.00
33
Phi 4Microsoft
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
0
vs boards won of 33 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GLM 5V Turbo has the edge where the context window is larger, 203K against 16K tokens.

Shared results
33
GLM 5V Turbo only
32
Phi 4 only
12
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, Phi 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 98.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5V Turbo 98.5% against Phi 4 0.0%, 98.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against Phi 4 $0.14 per million output tokens, 28.6x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Phi 4 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsPhi 4Ties
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards330
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.1%Only Phi 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%3.8%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: coding14661231GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601228GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.55.9GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured130.5Only Phi 4 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%0.0%GLM 5V Turbo
BALROGNot measured11.6%Only Phi 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%57.5%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%3.8%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured56.1%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431220GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531203GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561230GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured18.0Only Phi 4 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.0%Only Phi 4 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured13.8%Only Phi 4 measured
MATH level 5Not measured64.9%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: math14421246GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471254GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured71.4%Only Phi 4 measured
MMLUNot measured84.8%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: science14481206GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331202GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361241GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14351199GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
Design Arena: websites1230Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1213Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1219Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1202Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1209Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1228Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1151Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1118Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
IFBench61.1%23.5%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%0.0%GLM 5V Turbo
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured62.6%Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text14371217GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231201GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171181GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English14541231GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201197GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911212GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14221222GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1158Only Phi 4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971151GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14431224GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14521234GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321209GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311206GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381217GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201198GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071162GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboPhi 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Phi 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Phi 4$0.0039Exceeds the context window

Phi 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Phi 4$0.015Exceeds the context window

Phi 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Phi 4
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboMicrosoft Phi 4
MakerZ.aiMicrosoft
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026January 10, 2025
Context window203K16K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.07
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.14
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Phi 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GLM 5V Turbo has the edge where the context window is larger, 203K against 16K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Phi 4?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Phi 4 costs $0.07 and $0.14. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Phi 4?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Phi 4 comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Phi 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next