Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-4

GLM 5V Turbo leads GPT-4 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 6.7, and GLM 5V Turbo costs 15.0x less per output token ($4.00 vs $60.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace GLM 5V Turbo Replace GPT-4
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
30
GPT-4OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$60.00
0
vs boards won of 30 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 15.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $60.00 per million) and a larger context window (203K against 8K tokens).

Model AGLM 5V TurboZ.aiNot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGPT-4OpenAINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
30
GLM 5V Turbo only
35
GPT-4 only
15
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, GPT-4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 45.5 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Korean: GLM 5V Turbo 1397 against GPT-4 1087, 51.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-4 $60.00 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-4 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsGPT-4Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning40
Math20
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards300
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured22.4%Only GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured39.7%Only GPT-4 measured
SWE-bench (full test set)Not measured12.5%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured13.1Only GPT-4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: coding14661209GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601195GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.56.7GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured125.7Only GPT-4 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1070Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1127Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%34.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured75.1%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431200GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531149GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561209GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
GSM8KNot measured92.0%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: math14421230GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471228GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured56.2%Only GPT-4 measured
MMLUNot measured86.4%Only GPT-4 measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured96.3%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: science14481177GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331145GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361191GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14351145GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
Design Arena: websites1230Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1210Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1218Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1202Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1208Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1228Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1151Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1117Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
IFBench61.1%33.2%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
DTBenchNot measured62.7%Only GPT-4 measured
LMCANot measured17.1%Only GPT-4 measured
HellaSwagNot measured95.3%Only GPT-4 measured
WinoGrandeNot measured87.5%Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text14371206GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231201GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171191GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English14541220GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201194GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911184GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14221198GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1137Only GPT-4 measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971087GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14431220GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14521197GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321195GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14321265GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311206GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381190GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201219GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071184GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-4$0.060Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-4$1.68Exceeds the context window

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-4$6.60Exceeds the context window

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-4
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026May 28, 2023
Context window203K8K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$30.00
Output $/Mtok$4.00$60.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 15.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $60.00 per million) and a larger context window (203K against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4 costs $30.00 and $60.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-4 comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next