GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash costs 3.1x less per output token than GLM 4.7 Flash ($0.13 vs $0.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for work measured by GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) or OTIS Mock AIME, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 2
- GLM 4.7 Flash only
- 41
- Qwen3.7 Flash only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 2 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GLM 4.7 Flash has a AA Intelligence Index result, 14.9.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GLM 4.7 Flash has a Design Arena: websites result, 1194.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash takes 1M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash
GLM 4.7 Flash $0.0003, Qwen3.7 Flash $0.0001 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 28.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- OTIS Mock AIME: GLM 4.7 Flash 58.3% against Qwen3.7 Flash 86.7%, 28.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 against Qwen3.7 Flash $0.13 per million output tokens, 3.1x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 4.7 Flash takes 200K tokens, Qwen3.7 Flash 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 4.7 Flash | Bars | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reasoning | 0 | 1 | ||
| Math | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 2 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 22.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 420.1 | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1382 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1389 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 14.9 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 144.1 | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 58.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 60.5% | 82.3% | Qwen3.7 Flash |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 15.0% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1356 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1357 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1369 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 58.3% | 86.7% | Qwen3.7 Flash |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 19.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1355 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1369 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text: science | 1358 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1343 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1357 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1343 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1194 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1208 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1135 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1123 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1121 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1178 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1038 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 60.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 41.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text | 1351 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1327 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1296 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1373 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1330 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1403 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1336 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1283 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1332 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1350 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1333 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1291 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1342 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1345 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1320 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1304 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 4.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | January 19, 2026 | July 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.0653 | $0.03 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $0.13 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 4.7 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Flash for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for work measured by GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) or OTIS Mock AIME, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03 and $0.13. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash comparison based on?
2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.7 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.