Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. 3 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
14.9
Output $/M
$0.40
3
Mixtral 8x22B InstructMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
5.7
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GLM 4.7 Flash has the edge where output tokens cost 15.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 200K against 66K tokens.

Shared results
3
GLM 4.7 Flash only
40
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct only
4
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 14.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GLM 4.7 Flash 58.1% against Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 33.2%, 24.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 against Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $6.00 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.7 Flash takes 200K tokens, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 66K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.7 FlashBarsMixtral 8x22B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.8%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1389Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.95.7GLM 4.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured122.0Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.1%33.2%GLM 4.7 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%4.0%GLM 4.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)60.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1356Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1357Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1369Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
OTIS Mock AIME58.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: math1355Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1369Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured53.7%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1358Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1357Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1194Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: UI components1208Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: game dev1135Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: data viz1123Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: 3D1121Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: all code categories1178Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Design Arena: SVG1038Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
IFBench60.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
DTBenchNot measured55.1%Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1351Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1327Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1296Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1330Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1403Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1336Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1283Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1332Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1350Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1333Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1291Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1342Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1345Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1320Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1304Not measuredOnly GLM 4.7 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMixtral 8x22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.0050Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.118Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct$0.460Exceeds the context window

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.7 Flash and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.7 FlashMistral Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
MakerZ.aiMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 19, 2026April 17, 2024
Context window200K66K
Input $/Mtok$0.0653$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.40$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.7 Flash better than Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GLM 4.7 Flash has the edge where output tokens cost 15.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 200K against 66K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.7 Flash or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?

GLM 4.7 Flash, with 200K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.7 Flash vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 4.7 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next