Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 14B

GLM 4.5 Air leads Qwen3 14B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.1 to 6.7, and Qwen3 14B costs 4.8x less per output token ($0.23 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.5 AirZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
10
Qwen3 14BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.23
2
vs boards won of 12 shared

GLM 4.5 Air or Qwen3 14B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.5 Air for a larger context window (131K against 41K tokens) and work measured by Kagi LLM Benchmark or IFBench, where it leads.

Shared results
12
GLM 4.5 Air only
36
Qwen3 14B only
8
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.5 Air not benchmarked, Qwen3 14B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 24.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GLM 4.5 Air 46.7% against Qwen3 14B 0.0%, 46.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.5 Air $1.10 against Qwen3 14B $0.23 per million output tokens, 4.8x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.5 Air takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 14B 41K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.5 AirBarsQwen3 14BTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning21
Math20
Knowledge10
General11
All shared boards102
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)68.4%52.3%GLM 4.5 Air
SciCodeNot measured30.7%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)20.5%5.3%GLM 4.5 Air
GSO-Bench2.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: coding1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1401Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.16.7GLM 4.5 Air
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured138.2Only Qwen3 14B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom46.5%34.5%GLM 4.5 Air
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured41.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%60.4%GLM 4.5 Air
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.0%4.5%GLM 4.5 Air
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured63.8%Only Qwen3 14B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1379Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: expert1370Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1388Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.0%49.1%Qwen3 14B
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
AA Math Index80.758.0GLM 4.5 Air
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)80.7%58.0%GLM 4.5 Air
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured66.4%Only Qwen3 14B measured
LMArena Text: math1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)81.5%77.4%GLM 4.5 Air
LMArena Text: science1407Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1402Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1382Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
Design Arena: websites1146Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: UI components1120Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: game dev1094Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: data viz1186Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: 3D1122Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: all code categories1137Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Design Arena: SVG1071Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
IFBench37.6%40.5%Qwen3 14B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)46.7%0.0%GLM 4.5 Air
DTBenchNot measured64.0%Only Qwen3 14B measured
LMCANot measured18.2%Only Qwen3 14B measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured62.5%Only Qwen3 14B measured
LMArena Text1384Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1343Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: English1397Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: non-English1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1426Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: German1377Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1348Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Korean1308Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: French1400Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1385Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Russian1373Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: Polish1368Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1371Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1366Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1354Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1339Not measuredOnly GLM 4.5 Air measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
BenchmarkGLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3 14B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.013Fits in one request
Qwen3 14B$0.0062Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 14B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.5 Air$0.051Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 14B$0.024Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 14B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.5 Air and Qwen3 14B
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.5 AirQwen3 14B
MakerZ.aiQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025April 28, 2025
Context window131K41K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.11
Output $/Mtok$1.10$0.23
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.5 Air better than Qwen3 14B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 Air for a larger context window (131K against 41K tokens) and work measured by Kagi LLM Benchmark or IFBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 Air or Qwen3 14B?

GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B costs $0.11 and $0.23. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 Air or Qwen3 14B?

GLM 4.5 Air, with 131K tokens against 41K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 Air vs Qwen3 14B comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5 Air's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 14B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next