Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Gemma 4 31B costs 1.4x less per output token than Mistral Small 3.1 24B ($0.40 vs $0.555 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 4 31BGoogle
Coding
39.0
Overall
42.1
Output $/M
$0.40
35
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
0
vs boards won of 35 shared

Gemma 4 31B or Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which to pick

Only Gemma 4 31B has a coding score, 39.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
35
Gemma 4 31B only
36
Mistral Small 3.1 24B only
3
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 4 31B 39.0 from 2 benchmarks, Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 33.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: Gemma 4 31B 1475 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B 1253, 37.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 4 31B $0.40 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Gemma 4 31B takes 262K tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 4 31BBarsMistral Small 3.1 24BTies
Coding20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General220
All shared boards350
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LiveBench coding49.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena WebDev1367Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
AA Coding Index43.4Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
SciCode45.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)36.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
WeirdML52.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
ALE-Bench925.5Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: coding14591309Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: software and IT14631301Gemma 4 31B
LMArena WebDev: React1359Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1380Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
SciCode8.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index14.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index143.0Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AA Agentic Index4.2Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LiveBench research44.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LiveBench browser4.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LiveBench long agentic13.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom65.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LiveBench reasoning68.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)75.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14481278Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: expert14641257Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561290Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: diagrams12831119Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: homework13101158Gemma 4 31B
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME73.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: math14631261Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14651271Gemma 4 31B
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
CaseLaw (Vals AI)52.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
SimpleQA Verified10.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text: science14571265Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14511267Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: legal and government14381271Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: business and finance14301257Gemma 4 31B
FACTS Benchmark Suite45.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LiveBench design58.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index220
General benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LiveBench data analysis53.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
SAGE (Vals AI)55.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
IFBench75.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
DTBench82.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMCA39.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
LMArena Text14431277Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: instruction following14331263Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: creative writing14171252Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision12761136Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: English14511295Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: non-English14301255Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: Chinese14751253Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1266Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1208Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1207Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: French14361273Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: Spanish14421284Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: Russian14601263Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: Polish14331242Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: multi-turn14521270Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: longer queries14461299Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: writing and language14321268Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14051250Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: English12711157Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: Chinese13261155Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: reading text12821132Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: humor12801142Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: captioning12181153Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12261155Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Vision: creative writing12851123Gemma 4 31B
LMArena Document1425Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 31B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 4 31B$0.0003Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 4 31B$0.0082Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 4 31B$0.032Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window

Gemma 4 31B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 4 31BMistral Small 3.1 24B
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 2, 2026March 17, 2025
Context window262K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.14$0.351
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.555
Coding index39.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 4 31B better than Mistral Small 3.1 24B for coding?

Only Gemma 4 31B has a coding score, 39.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 3.1 24B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 and $0.555. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 31B or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Gemma 4 31B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemma 4 31B's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3.1 24B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next