Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) cost about the same per output token ($0.60 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 30 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemma 4 26B A4B Replace GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
54.7
Output $/M
$0.60
30
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 30 shared

Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

Model AGemma 4 26B A4BGoogleNot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
30
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
25
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
16
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 47.7 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Gemma 4 26B A4B 82.2% against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9%, 75.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Both cost $0.60 per million output tokens.
Context window
Gemma 4 26B A4B takes 262K tokens, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BBarsGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Ties
Coding30
Reasoning40
Math30
Knowledge40
General160
All shared boards300
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured3.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena WebDev1360Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
AA Coding Index39.3Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
SciCode40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
WeirdML35.2%11.8%Gemma 4 26B A4B
ALE-Bench927.2Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: coding14461289Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: software and IT14541291Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena WebDev: React1351Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1361Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Epoch Capabilities Index141.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Agentic Index2.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom43.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
BALROGNot measured17.4%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)73.2%37.7%Gemma 4 26B A4B
SimpleBenchNot measured10.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured3.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured12.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCTNot measured34.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14381267Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: expert14471235Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14481278Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1264Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1293Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
OTIS Mock AIME82.2%6.9%Gemma 4 26B A4B
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured0.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 5Not measured52.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math14701267Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14761271Gemma 4 26B A4B
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured8.3%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLUNot measured76.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science14461286Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281282Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: legal and government14561305Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: business and finance14291265Gemma 4 26B A4B
FACTS Benchmark Suite42.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index160
General benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
IFBench72.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
DTBench74.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMCA29.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured67.2%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text14341286Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: instruction following14201258Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: creative writing14011268Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision12601066Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: English14441301Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: non-English14211266Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: Chinese14961265Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1272Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1216Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1195Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: French14601297Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: Spanish14151276Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: Russian14341275Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1244Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14411285Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: longer queries14271289Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: writing and language14051282Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14031253Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: English12561072Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: Chinese13121033Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: reading text1268Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1272Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1297Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1191Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1256Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request

Same cost

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request

Same cost

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.036Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window

Same cost

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 4 26B A4B and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 4 26B A4BOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 3, 2026July 18, 2024
Context window262K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B for a larger context window (262K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

Gemma 4 26B A4B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) comparison based on?

30 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next