Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads Gemma 3 4B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.9 to 4.8, and Gemma 3 4B costs 25.3x less per output token ($0.075 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 3 4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
22.6
Output $/M
$0.075
0
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
33
vs boards won of 33 shared

Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 4B for output tokens 25.3x cheaper ($0.075 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
33
Gemma 3 4B only
9
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
16
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 4B not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 52.4 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run): Gemma 3 4B 12.7% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 88.3%, 75.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 4B $0.075 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 25.3x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 4B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 4BBarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge05
General013
All shared boards033
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index2.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.2%64.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%11.4%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: coding12301438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT12691442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index4.89.9Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index115.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom5.0%54.1%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)19.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.1%77.2%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%11.9%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)23.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12531428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert12231442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12531439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math Index12.788.3Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)12.7%88.3%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME7.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: math12391425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12561419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)41.7%83.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: science13061444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13421431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government13271438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance13111433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench28.3%56.5%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)6.7%63.7%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
DTBench50.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMCA2.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text12911420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following12391406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing12701366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English13001429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English12731405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1463Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German12811424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1385Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1394Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1452Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian12941408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12551428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries12731419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language12881392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12331368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0025Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0097Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 4BQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025September 23, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.045$0.21
Output $/Mtok$0.075$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 4B for output tokens 25.3x cheaper ($0.075 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemma 3 4B costs $0.045 per million input tokens and $0.075 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 4B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next