Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 4B vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 5V Turbo leads Gemma 3 4B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 4.8, and Gemma 3 4B costs 53.3x less per output token ($0.075 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 3 4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
22.6
Output $/M
$0.075
0
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
29
vs boards won of 29 shared

Gemma 3 4B or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 4B for output tokens 53.3x cheaper ($0.075 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
29
Gemma 3 4B only
13
GLM 5V Turbo only
36
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 4B not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 93.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemma 3 4B 5.0% against GLM 5V Turbo 98.5%, 93.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 4B $0.075 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 53.3x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 4B takes 131K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 4BBarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General013
All shared boards029
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding Index2.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%32.6%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: coding12301466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT12691460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index4.823.5GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities Index115.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1070Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1127Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom5.0%98.5%GLM 5V Turbo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)19.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.1%80.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%17.1%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)23.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12531443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert12231453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12531456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Math Index12.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)12.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
OTIS Mock AIME7.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: math12391442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work12561447GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)41.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: science13061448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13421433GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government13271436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance13111435GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1210Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1218Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1202Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1208Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1228Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1151Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBench28.3%61.1%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)6.7%70.3%GLM 5V Turbo
DTBench50.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMCA2.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text12911437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following12391423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing12701417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English13001454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English12731420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1491Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German12811422GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1397Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1443Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1452Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian12941432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1432Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12551431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries12731438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language12881420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12331407GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0001Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0025Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0097Exceeds the context window
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 4B and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 4BZ.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerGoogleZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025April 1, 2026
Context window131K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.045$1.20
Output $/Mtok$0.075$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 4B for output tokens 53.3x cheaper ($0.075 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or GLM 5V Turbo?

Gemma 3 4B costs $0.045 per million input tokens and $0.075 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 4B or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 4B vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 4B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next