LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Updated October 21, 2026. 39 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemma 3 27BGoogle
Coding
4.9
Overall
4.9
Output $/M
$0.35
12
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
50.0
Overall
11.9
Output $/M
$1.00
27
vs boards won of 39 shared

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 4.9 for Gemma 3 27B.

Pick Gemma 3 27B when output tokens cost 2.9x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: science or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.

Shared results
39
Gemma 3 27B only
23
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
13
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 27B 4.9 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 50.0 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 33.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): Gemma 3 27B 13.7% against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 58.5%, 44.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 27B $0.35 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 27B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 27BBarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding04
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math04
Knowledge41
General811
All shared boards1227
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Aider polyglot4.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1275Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
AA Coding Index10.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%58.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SciCode23.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%18.9%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured461.4Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: coding13221412Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: software and IT13541393Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1257Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1287Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index4.911.9Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Epoch Capabilities Index130.0Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Agentic Index0.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom10.5%43.6%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.8%61.8%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.4%4.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13401372Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: expert13041338Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531380Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1156Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1160Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Math Index20.739.3Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)20.7%39.3%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
OTIS Mock AIME22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
MATH level 574.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: math13121365Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: mathematical work13271367Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)66.9%78.8%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: science13831347Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13911347Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: legal and government13751358Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: business and finance13601343Gemma 3 27B
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1112Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1099Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1084Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1143Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index811
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
IFBench31.8%40.5%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)7.3%45.7%Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
DTBench52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMCA12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)79.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text13581357Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: instruction following13211355Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: creative writing13451333Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Vision1165Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: English13771359Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: non-English13341346Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Chinese13461357Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: German13621325Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: Japanese12871311Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Korean13081305Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: French13681398Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Spanish13491360Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Russian13491366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: Polish13451344Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: multi-turn13451366Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: longer queries13331378Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
LMArena Text: writing and language13471340Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13201317Gemma 3 27B
LMArena Vision: English1188Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1164Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1156Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1166Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1151Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1196Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1177Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0008Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0050Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.018Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.019Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.070Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 27BQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 12, 2025July 23, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.35$1.00
Coding index4.950.0
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding: it scores 50.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 4.9 for Gemma 3 27B. Pick Gemma 3 27B when output tokens cost 2.9x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: science or LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.35 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

39 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemma 3 27B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next