Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 leads Gemma 3 27B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.5 to 4.9, at about the same output price ($0.30 vs $0.30 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 45 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemma 3 27B for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 45
- Gemma 3 27B only
- 21
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 leads, 7.5 against 4.9.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Gemma 3 27B has a AA Agentic Index result, 0.1.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 takes 262K tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 3 27B
Gemma 3 27B $0.0002, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemma 3 27B not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 31.7 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): Gemma 3 27B 13.7% against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 70.7%, 57.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Both cost $0.30 per million output tokens.
- Context window
- Gemma 3 27B takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemma 3 27B | Bars | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 5 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 6 | ||
| Math | 0 | 5 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 2 | 19 | ||
| All shared boards | 2 | 43 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 4.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| AA Coding Index | 10.1 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.7% | 70.7% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| SciCode | 23.3% | 33.0% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.8% | 6.1% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1322 | 1416 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1354 | 1417 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| SciCode | 0.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 4.9 | 7.5 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.0 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 0.1 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 10.5% | 28.1% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 29.5% | 41.4% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.8% | 70.7% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.4% | 10.3% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 47.7% | 55.6% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1340 | 1398 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1304 | 1397 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1353 | 1406 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1156 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1160 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 35.1% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 20.7 | 66.3 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 20.7% | 66.3% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 22.5% | 62.2% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| MATH level 5 | 74.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1312 | 1394 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1327 | 1411 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 66.9% | 80.5% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| GeoBench | 52.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1383 | 1393 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1391 | 1392 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1375 | 1387 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1360 | 1389 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 29.1% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index219
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 31.8% | 50.7% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 7.3% | 61.3% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 67.2% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMCA | 12.3% | 22.4% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 79.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Text | 1358 | 1384 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1321 | 1363 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1345 | 1317 | Gemma 3 27B |
| LMArena Vision | 1165 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1377 | 1391 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1334 | 1372 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1346 | 1432 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1362 | 1379 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1287 | 1337 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1308 | 1330 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1368 | 1419 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1349 | 1404 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1349 | 1369 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1345 | 1353 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1345 | 1378 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1333 | 1378 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1347 | 1336 | Gemma 3 27B |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1320 | 1334 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1188 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1164 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1156 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1166 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1151 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1196 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1177 | Not measured | Only Gemma 3 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 3 27B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemma 3 27B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemma 3 27B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | March 12, 2025 | July 29, 2025 |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.08 | $0.09 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemma 3 27B better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 27B for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?
Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?
45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.