Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 27B vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 5V Turbo leads Gemma 3 27B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 4.9, and Gemma 3 27B costs 13.3x less per output token ($0.30 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 44 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Gemma 3 27B Replace GLM 5V Turbo
Gemma 3 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
31.4
Output $/M
$0.30
0
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
44
vs boards won of 44 shared

Gemma 3 27B or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 13.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Model AGemma 3 27BGoogleNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BGLM 5V TurboZ.aiNot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
44
Gemma 3 27B only
22
GLM 5V Turbo only
21
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 27B not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 88.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemma 3 27B 10.5% against GLM 5V Turbo 98.5%, 88.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 27B $0.30 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 13.3x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 27B takes 131K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 27BBarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning07
Math02
Knowledge04
General026
All shared boards044
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
Aider polyglot4.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding Index10.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
SciCode23.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%32.6%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: coding13221466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT13541460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index4.923.5GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities Index130.0Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Agentic Index0.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1070Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1128Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom10.5%98.5%GLM 5V Turbo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)29.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.8%80.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.4%17.1%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13401443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert13041453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13531456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams11561286GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: homework11601273GLM 5V Turbo
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Math Index20.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)20.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
OTIS Mock AIME22.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
MATH level 574.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: math13121442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work13271447GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)66.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
GeoBench52.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: science13831448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13911433GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government13751436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance13601435GLM 5V Turbo
FACTS Benchmark Suite29.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1210Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1218Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1202Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1208Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1150Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index026
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBench31.8%61.1%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)7.3%70.3%GLM 5V Turbo
DTBench52.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMCA12.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)79.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text13581437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following13211423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing13451417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision11651264GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: English13771454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English13341420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese13461491GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German13621422GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Japanese1287Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: Korean13081397GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French13681443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish13491452GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian13491432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish13451432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn13451431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries13331438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language13471420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13201407GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English11881274GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: Chinese11641329GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: reading text11561270GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: humor11661268GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: captioning11511264GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: recognizing things11961241GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: creative writing11771252GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0002Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.0049Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 27B$0.019Exceeds the context window
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 27B and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 27BZ.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerGoogleZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 12, 2025April 1, 2026
Context window131K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.08$1.20
Output $/Mtok$0.30$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 27B for output tokens 13.3x cheaper ($0.30 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or GLM 5V Turbo?

Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 27B or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 27B vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

44 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next