Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 12B vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 5V Turbo leads Gemma 3 12B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 3.8, and Gemma 3 12B costs 24.6x less per output token ($0.1625 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 3 12BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
28.0
Output $/M
$0.1625
0
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
29
vs boards won of 29 shared

Gemma 3 12B or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 3 12B for output tokens 24.6x cheaper ($0.1625 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
29
Gemma 3 12B only
14
GLM 5V Turbo only
36
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 12B not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 87.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemma 3 12B 10.8% against GLM 5V Turbo 98.5%, 87.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 12B $0.1625 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 24.6x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 12B takes 131K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 12BBarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General013
All shared boards029
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1402Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding Index5.8Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)13.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
SciCode16.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%32.6%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: coding12811466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT13131460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
SciCode0.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index3.823.5GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities Index123.5Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Agentic Index0.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1070Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1127Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom10.8%98.5%GLM 5V Turbo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)30.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)34.9%80.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%17.1%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)39.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13091443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert12481453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13181456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Math Index18.3Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)18.3%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
OTIS Mock AIME16.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
LMArena Text: math13071442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work13361447GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)59.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
LMArena Text: science13661448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13341433GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government13811436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance13761435GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1210Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1218Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1202Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1208Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1228Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1151Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1117Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index013
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBench36.7%61.1%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)8.3%70.3%GLM 5V Turbo
DTBench48.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
LMCA4.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 12B measured
LMArena Text13341437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following12991423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing13311417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English13491454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English13181420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1491Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German13701422GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1397Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1443Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1452Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian13351432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1432Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13341431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries13171438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language13071420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12971407GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkGemma 3 12BGLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 12B$0.0002Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 12B$0.0042Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 12B$0.017Exceeds the context window
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

Gemma 3 12B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 12B and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 12BZ.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerGoogleZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025April 1, 2026
Context window131K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.075$1.20
Output $/Mtok$0.1625$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 12B better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 3 12B for output tokens 24.6x cheaper ($0.1625 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or GLM 5V Turbo?

Gemma 3 12B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.1625 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 12B or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 12B vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 3 12B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next