Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 2 27B vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs 2.2x less per output token than Gemma 2 27B ($0.30 vs $0.65 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Gemma 2 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.65
Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $0.65 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is 2.2x cheaper.

Gemma 2 27B or Voxtral Small 24B 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Gemma 2 27B has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and Epoch Capabilities Index; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Gemma 2 27B $0.65 against Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Gemma 2 27B takes 8K tokens, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
LMArena Text: coding1211Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1228Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
Epoch Capabilities Index122.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1198Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: expert1171Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1206Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIME1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
MATH level 527.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: math1212Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1221Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
LegalBench (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
MMLU75.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: science1228Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1198Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1241Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1208Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BVoxtral Small 24B 2507Leader
DTBench48.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMCA7.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text1231Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1206Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1240Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: English1242Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1217Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1221Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: German1209Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1175Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1174Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: French1248Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1228Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1234Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1277Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1224Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1230Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1249Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1212Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.0010Fits in one request
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.0003Fits in one request

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.034Exceeds the context window
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.0059Exceeds the context window

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.137Exceeds the context window
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.023Exceeds the context window

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 2 27B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 2 27BMistral Voxtral Small 24B 2507
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 13, 2024October 30, 2025
Context window8K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.65$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.65$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507, with 33K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Gemma 2 27B and Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Gemma 2 27B has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and Epoch Capabilities Index; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next