Gemma 2 27B vs Solar Pro 4
Gemma 2 27B and Solar Pro 4 cost about the same per output token ($0.65 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemma 2 27B or Solar Pro 4: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemma 2 27B for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 28
- Gemma 2 27B only
- 8
- Solar Pro 4 only
- 17
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Solar Pro 4 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 28.2.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Solar Pro 4 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1176.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 takes 524K tokens against 8K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 4
Gemma 2 27B $0.0010, Solar Pro 4 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked, Solar Pro 4 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 37.7 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: expert: Gemma 2 27B 1171 against Solar Pro 4 1428, 42.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemma 2 27B $0.65 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
- Context window
- Gemma 2 27B takes 8K tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemma 2 27B | Bars | Solar Pro 4 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| General | 0 | 17 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 28 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1371 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 52.7 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 48.0% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 179.3 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1211 | 1438 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1228 | 1431 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1363 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1371 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 28.2 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 122.1 | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1105 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 89.1% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 29.8% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 36.5% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1198 | 1400 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1171 | 1428 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1206 | 1427 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 1.4% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| MATH level 5 | 27.9% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1212 | 1421 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1221 | 1427 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 68.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| MMLU | 75.7% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1228 | 1404 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1198 | 1374 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1241 | 1383 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1208 | 1381 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1176 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1150 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1170 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1177 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1178 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1182 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 70.7% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| DTBench | 48.0% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMCA | 7.1% | Not measured | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text | 1231 | 1388 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1206 | 1375 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1240 | 1317 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1242 | 1414 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1217 | 1363 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1221 | 1422 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1209 | 1358 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1175 | 1320 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1174 | 1383 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1248 | 1400 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1228 | 1409 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1234 | 1357 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1277 | 1304 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1224 | 1385 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1230 | 1382 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1249 | 1344 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1212 | 1332 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 27B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemma 2 27B | Upstage Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Upstage | |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 13, 2024 | August 10, 2026 |
| Context window | 8K | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.65 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.65 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemma 2 27B better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 2 27B for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Solar Pro 4?
Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Solar Pro 4?
Solar Pro 4, with 524K tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemma 2 27B vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?
28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemma 2 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.