Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Gemma 2 27B costs 2.9x less per output token than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.65 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemma 2 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.65
0
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
28
vs boards won of 28 shared

Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 2.9x cheaper ($0.65 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
28
Gemma 2 27B only
8
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
21
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 40.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: Gemma 2 27B 1171 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 1442, 45.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 2 27B $0.65 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
Context window
Gemma 2 27B takes 8K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 2 27BBarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards028
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.4%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding12111438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT12281442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.9Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index122.1Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured54.1%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.2%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.9%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)36.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11981428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert11711442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12061439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME1.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
MATH level 527.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: math12121425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12211419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)68.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
MMLU75.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text: science12281444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11981431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government12411438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance12081433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBenchNot measured56.5%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured63.7%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
DTBench48.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMCA7.1%Not measuredOnly Gemma 2 27B measured
LMArena Text12311420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following12061406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing12401366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English12421429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English12171405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese12211463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German12091424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese11751385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean11741394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French12481452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish12281428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian12341408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish12771419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn12241428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries12301419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language12491392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12121368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Gemma 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.034Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 2 27B$0.137Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 2 27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerGoogleQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 13, 2024September 23, 2025
Context window8K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.65$0.21
Output $/Mtok$0.65$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 2 27B better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemma 2 27B for output tokens 2.9x cheaper ($0.65 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemma 2 27B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next