Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs o3 Pro

Nano Banana 2.1 costs 10.7x less per output token than o3 Pro ($7.50 vs $80.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nano Banana 2.1Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$7.50
o3 ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$80.00
vs $7.50 vs $80.00 per 1M output tokens. Nano Banana 2.1 is 10.7x cheaper.

Nano Banana 2.1 or o3 Pro: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nano Banana 2.1 for output tokens 10.7x cheaper ($7.50 vs $80.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2.1 has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; o3 Pro on Aider polyglot, WeirdML and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nano Banana 2.1 not benchmarked, o3 Pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nano Banana 2.1 $7.50 against o3 Pro $80.00 per million output tokens, 10.7x apart.
Context window
Nano Banana 2.1 takes 66K tokens, o3 Pro 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Nano Banana 2.1 and o3 Pro
BenchmarkNano Banana 2.1o3 ProLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured84.9%Only o3 Pro measured
WeirdMLNot measured58.2%Only o3 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nano Banana 2.1 and o3 Pro
BenchmarkNano Banana 2.1o3 ProLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured21.9Only o3 Pro measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.3Only o3 Pro measured
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nano Banana 2.1 and o3 Pro
BenchmarkNano Banana 2.1o3 ProLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.5%Only o3 Pro measured
ARC-AGINot measured59.3%Only o3 Pro measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured4.9%Only o3 Pro measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured72.1%Only o3 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nano Banana 2.1 and o3 Pro
BenchmarkNano Banana 2.1o3 ProLeader
DTBenchNot measured86.9%Only o3 Pro measured
LMCANot measured38.5%Only o3 Pro measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured97.2%Only o3 Pro measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured84.4%Only o3 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for Nano Banana 2.1 and o3 Pro
BenchmarkNano Banana 2.1o3 ProLeader
Design Arena: images1293Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2.1 measured
Design Arena: graphic design1333Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2.1 measured
Design Arena: logos1277Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2.1 measured
LMArena Text to Image1328Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2.1 measured
LMArena Image Edit1426Not measuredOnly Nano Banana 2.1 measured

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nano Banana 2.1$0.0053Fits in one request
o3 Pro$0.060Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nano Banana 2.1$0.098Fits in one request
o3 Pro$1.24Fits in one request

Nano Banana 2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nano Banana 2.1$0.375Exceeds the context window
o3 Pro$4.80Exceeds the context window

Nano Banana 2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nano Banana 2.1 and o3 Pro
SpecificationGoogle Nano Banana 2.1OpenAI o3 Pro
MakerGoogleOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 6, 2026June 10, 2025
Context window66K200K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$20.00
Output $/Mtok$7.50$80.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nano Banana 2.1 better than o3 Pro for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nano Banana 2.1 for output tokens 10.7x cheaper ($7.50 vs $80.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or o3 Pro?

Nano Banana 2.1 costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; o3 Pro costs $20.00 and $80.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nano Banana 2.1 or o3 Pro?

o3 Pro, with 200K tokens against 66K.

Has any benchmark tested both Nano Banana 2.1 and o3 Pro?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nano Banana 2.1 has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; o3 Pro on Aider polyglot, WeirdML and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next