Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Moondream 3 Preview

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 1.7x less per output token than Moondream 3 Preview ($1.50 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
M Moondream 3 PreviewMoondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $1.50 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is 1.7x cheaper.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Moondream 3 Preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 32K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has results on SciCode, Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and WeirdML; Moondream 3 Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Moondream 3 Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $1.50 against Moondream 3 Preview $2.50 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Moondream 3 Preview 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
SciCode43.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)24.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
WeirdML52.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
Epoch Capabilities Index144.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom31.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
DeepResearch Bench37.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)81.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
OTIS Mock AIME80.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 327.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMoondream 3 PreviewLeader
IFBench77.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
DTBench76.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
LMCA35.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.0010Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.0015Fits in one request

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.017Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.022Exceeds the context window

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.065Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.085Exceeds the context window

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Moondream 3 Preview
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteMoondream 3 Preview
MakerGoogleMoondream
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 7, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M32K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.30
Output $/Mtok$1.50$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Moondream 3 Preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for output tokens 1.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $2.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 32K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Moondream 3 Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Moondream 3 Preview costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Moondream 3 Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 32K.

Has any benchmark tested both Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Moondream 3 Preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has results on SciCode, Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and WeirdML; Moondream 3 Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next