Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiniMax M2

MiniMax M2 costs 1.5x less per output token than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ($1.02 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
5
MiniMax M2MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.02
2
vs boards won of 7 shared

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiniMax M2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for a larger context window (1.05M against 205K tokens) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
7
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite only
9
MiniMax M2 only
43
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite not benchmarked, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 55.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 31.3% against MiniMax M2 86.8%, 55.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $1.50 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemini 3.1 Flash LiteBarsMiniMax M2Ties
Coding01
Agentic work01
Reasoning30
General20
All shared boards52
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured61.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1297Only MiniMax M2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.6%Only MiniMax M2 measured
SciCode43.4%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)24.2%25.8%MiniMax M2
Terminal-BenchNot measured30.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
WeirdML52.2%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1371Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1373Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1306Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured18.6Only MiniMax M2 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.3Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom31.3%86.8%MiniMax M2
DeepResearch Bench37.3%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$161Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.2%77.7%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.2%13.7%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)81.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1338Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1376Only MiniMax M2 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%57.8%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured78.3Only MiniMax M2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.3%Only MiniMax M2 measured
OTIS Mock AIME80.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 327.7%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1351Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1368Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1348Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1367Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1349Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1143Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1137Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1118Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1140Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1098Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1135Only MiniMax M2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1100Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
IFBench77.2%72.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)74.3%64.3%Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
DTBench76.8%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
LMCA35.0%Not measuredOnly Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured
LMArena TextNot measured1340Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1329Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1286Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1364Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1313Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1366Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1357Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1336Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1326Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1330Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1312Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1361Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1331Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1295Only MiniMax M2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1298Only MiniMax M2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.0010Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.0008Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.017Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.016Fits in one request

MiniMax M2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.065Fits in one request
MiniMax M2$0.061Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and MiniMax M2
SpecificationGoogle Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteMiniMax M2
MakerGoogleMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 7, 2026October 23, 2025
Context window1.05M205K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.255
Output $/Mtok$1.50$1.02
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.702
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than MiniMax M2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for a larger context window (1.05M against 205K tokens) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiniMax M2?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or MiniMax M2?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next