Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemma 2 27B
Gemma 2 27B costs 2.3x less per output token than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite ($0.65 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemma 2 27B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for a larger context window (1.05M against 8K tokens).
- Shared results
- 5
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite only
- 11
- Gemma 2 27B only
- 31
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens against 8K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 2 27B
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $0.0010, Gemma 2 27B $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite not benchmarked, Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 78.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- OTIS Mock AIME: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 80.0% against Gemma 2 27B 1.4%, 78.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite $1.50 against Gemma 2 27B $0.65 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
- Context window
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite takes 1.05M tokens, Gemma 2 27B 8K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Bars | Gemma 2 27B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 0 | ||
| Math | 1 | 0 | ||
| General | 2 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 5 | 0 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 43.4% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 24.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1211 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1228 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.3 | 122.1 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 31.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 82.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 17.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 81.8% | 36.5% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1198 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1171 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1206 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 80.0% | 1.4% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 27.7% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 27.9% | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1212 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1221 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 68.0% | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| MMLU | Not measured | 75.7% | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1228 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1198 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1241 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1208 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 77.2% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 74.3% | Not measured | Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite measured |
| DTBench | 76.8% | 48.0% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| LMCA | 35.0% | 7.1% | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1231 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1206 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1240 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1242 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1217 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1221 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1209 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1175 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1174 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1248 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1228 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1234 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1277 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1224 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1230 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1249 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1212 | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Gemma 2 27B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Google Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Google Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | ||
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | May 7, 2026 | July 13, 2024 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 8K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.25 | $0.65 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $0.65 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Gemma 2 27B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for a larger context window (1.05M against 8K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemma 2 27B?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 and $0.65. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemma 2 27B?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks is the Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemma 2 27B comparison based on?
5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Gemma 2 27B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.