Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Devstral 2 2512 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct

Devstral 2 2512 leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 8.6 to 6.7, and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs 2.0x less per output token ($1.00 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
2
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Devstral 2 2512 for a larger context window (262K against 33K tokens).

Shared results
2
Devstral 2 2512 only
4
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
33
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 6.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
SWE-bench Verified: Devstral 2 2512 53.8% against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 47.0%, 6.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Devstral 2 2512 takes 262K tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDevstral 2 2512BarsQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
All shared boards20
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured16.4%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Verified53.8%47.0%Devstral 2 2512
AA Coding Index31.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1276Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1261Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.66.7Devstral 2 2512
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured119.5Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index2.3Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured41.7%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1221Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1269Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
GSM8KNot measured93.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1243Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured63.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
MMLUNot measured79.1%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured70.5%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1221Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1187Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1257Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1224Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
HellaSwagNot measured83.0%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured80.8%Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena TextNot measured1230Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1223Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1174Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1248Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1205Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1222Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1228Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1222Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1251Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1191Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1150Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window

Devstral 2 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Devstral 2 2512 and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
SpecificationMistral Devstral 2 2512Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 9, 2025November 11, 2024
Context window262K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.66
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved task$1.19Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Devstral 2 2512 better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Devstral 2 2512 for a larger context window (262K against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for Devstral 2 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Devstral 2 2512 or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?

Devstral 2 2512, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Devstral 2 2512 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Devstral 2 2512's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next