Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Devstral 2 2512 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads Devstral 2 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.7 to 8.6, and Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 3.3x less per output token ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Devstral 2 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
54.7
Output $/M
$0.60
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Devstral 2 2512 or Gemma 4 26B A4B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Devstral 2 2512 for work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
3
Devstral 2 2512 only
3
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
52
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Devstral 2 2512 not benchmarked, Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 8.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Devstral 2 2512 8.6 against Gemma 4 26B A4B 16.7, 8.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Devstral 2 2512 $2.00 against Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDevstral 2 2512BarsGemma 4 26B A4BTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
All shared boards03
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
SWE-bench Verified53.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1360Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
AA Coding Index31.339.3Gemma 4 26B A4B
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)62.8%Not measuredOnly Devstral 2 2512 measured
SciCodeNot measured40.0%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.0%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
WeirdMLNot measured35.2%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured927.2Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1446Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1454Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1351Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1362Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.616.7Gemma 4 26B A4B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured141.9Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
AA Agentic Index2.32.9Gemma 4 26B A4B
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured43.6%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.2%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured19.3%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured73.2%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1438Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1447Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1448Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1264Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1293Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured82.2%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1470Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1475Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1446Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1428Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1457Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1429Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured42.7%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
IFBenchNot measured72.4%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured65.7%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
DTBenchNot measured74.9%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMCANot measured29.7%Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1434Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1420Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1400Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1260Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1444Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1421Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1495Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1460Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1415Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1434Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1441Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1427Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1405Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1403Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1312Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1268Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1272Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1297Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1191Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1256Only Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Gemma 4 26B A4BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.0014Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0004Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.026Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0093Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Devstral 2 2512$0.100Fits in one request
Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.036Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Devstral 2 2512 and Gemma 4 26B A4B
SpecificationMistral Devstral 2 2512Google Gemma 4 26B A4B
MakerMistral AIGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 9, 2025April 3, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$1.19Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Devstral 2 2512 better than Gemma 4 26B A4B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Devstral 2 2512 for work measured by AA Coding Index or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Devstral 2 2512 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Devstral 2 2512 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for Devstral 2 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Devstral 2 2512 or Gemma 4 26B A4B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Devstral 2 2512 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Devstral 2 2512's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Gemma 4 26B A4B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next