LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs GPT-5.2-Codex

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek
Coding
54.6
Overall
24.4
Output $/M
$0.182
3
GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI
Coding
55.1
Overall
28.5
Output $/M
$14.00
2
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex are level for coding, 54.6 against 55.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 when output tokens cost 76.9x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 400K tokens. Pick GPT-5.2-Codex when what matters is ALE-Bench or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
5
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 only
43
GPT-5.2-Codex only
17
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 54.6 from 1 benchmark, GPT-5.2-Codex 55.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 33.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 1585 against GPT-5.2-Codex 1329, 42.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.182 against GPT-5.2-Codex $14.00 per million output tokens, 76.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes 1.05M tokens, GPT-5.2-Codex 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423BarsGPT-5.2-CodexTies
Coding31
Intelligence01
All shared boards32
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index31
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured72.8%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured66.3%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev15821339DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
AA Coding Index52.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured72.4%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured37.9%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.1%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured66.5%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
WeirdML45.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
ALE-Bench678.21299.9GPT-5.2-Codex
LMArena Text: coding1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1453Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena WebDev: React15851329DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
LMArena WebDev: HTML15581348DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.428.5GPT-5.2-Codex
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
AA Agentic Index26.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1051Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured993Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1090Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1176Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1142Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured92.1%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.9%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.7%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
SimpleBench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: expert1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
LMArena Text: math1426Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
LMArena Text: science1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
Design Arena: websites1208Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: UI components1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: game dev1197Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: data viz1127Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: 3D1189Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1205Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: SVG1155Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1109Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
IFBenchNot measured77.6%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured82.3%Only GPT-5.2-Codex measured
DTBench86.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMCA35.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1421Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1403Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: German1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1389Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1383Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: French1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1427Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1410Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1400Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423GPT-5.2-CodexLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.0002Fits in one request
GPT-5.2-Codex$0.0088Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.0051Fits in one request
GPT-5.2-Codex$0.130Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.020Fits in one request
GPT-5.2-Codex$0.490Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423OpenAI GPT-5.2-Codex
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 24, 2026January 14, 2026
Context window1.05M400K
Input $/Mtok$0.091$1.75
Output $/Mtok$0.182$14.00
Coding index54.655.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 better than GPT-5.2-Codex for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and GPT-5.2-Codex are level for coding, 54.6 against 55.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 when output tokens cost 76.9x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 400K tokens. Pick GPT-5.2-Codex when what matters is ALE-Bench or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or GPT-5.2-Codex?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.091 per million input tokens and $0.182 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2-Codex costs $1.75 and $14.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.2-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or GPT-5.2-Codex?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs GPT-5.2-Codex comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.2-Codex's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next