DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Updated October 21, 2026. 35 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.4x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 200K tokens.
- Shared results
- 35
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 only
- 13
- GLM 4.7 Flash only
- 8
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads, 24.4 against 14.9.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has a AA Agentic Index result, 26.3.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads, 1208 against 1194.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes 1.05M tokens against 200K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 4.7 Flash
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.0003, GLM 4.7 Flash $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 not benchmarked, GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- General, 15.6 points apart on average over 16 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: Polish: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 1436 against GLM 4.7 Flash 1291, 24.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.28 against GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes 1.05M tokens, GLM 4.7 Flash 200K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Bars | GLM 4.7 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 1 | ||
| General | 16 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 34 | 1 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 52.0 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 22.0% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 678.2 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1457 | 1382 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1453 | 1389 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1585 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1558 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 24.4 | 14.9 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.1 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 26.3 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 98.8% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 58.1% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 7.6% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 60.5% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| SimpleBench | 46.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1444 | 1356 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1441 | 1357 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1449 | 1369 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 58.3% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1426 | 1355 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1432 | 1369 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text: science | 1446 | 1358 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1448 | 1343 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1439 | 1357 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1425 | 1343 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index61
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1208 | 1194 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1165 | 1208 | GLM 4.7 Flash |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1197 | 1135 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1127 | 1123 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1189 | 1121 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1205 | 1178 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1155 | 1038 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1109 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index160
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | Not measured | 60.8% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 41.7% | Only GLM 4.7 Flash measured |
| DTBench | 86.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMCA | 35.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1432 | 1351 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1421 | 1327 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1403 | 1296 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1441 | 1373 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1419 | 1330 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1463 | 1403 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1419 | 1336 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1389 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1383 | 1283 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1439 | 1332 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1436 | 1350 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1427 | 1333 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1436 | 1291 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1449 | 1342 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1434 | 1345 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1410 | 1320 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1400 | 1304 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | GLM 4.7 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 4.7 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GLM 4.7 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GLM 4.7 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Z.ai GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | April 24, 2026 | January 19, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.14 | $0.0653 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.28 | $0.40 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 better than GLM 4.7 Flash for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has the edge where output tokens cost 1.4x less, and where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 200K tokens.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or GLM 4.7 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or GLM 4.7 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs GLM 4.7 Flash comparison based on?
35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GLM 4.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.