LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
37.6
Overall
34.8
Output $/M
$0.6468
5
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
28.6
Overall
21.4
Output $/M
$2.34
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for coding: it scores 37.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.6 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
5
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only
9
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
60
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 37.6 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 28.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Intelligence, 13.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 34.8 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 21.4, 13.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $0.6468 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpBarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding10
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
AA Coding Index65.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
SciCode49.7%44.8%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured621.9Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1464Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1388Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1410Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.821.4DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.8Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured24.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%89.3%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%29.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.4%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1448Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1450Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1453Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1454Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1455Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1191Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1163Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1141Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1175Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1161Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1180Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
IFBenchNot measured78.8%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%77.3%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
DTBenchNot measured87.5%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCANot measured37.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1437Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1424Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1402Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1443Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1498Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1445Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1429Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1430Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1446Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1415Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1399Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.013Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.050Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026February 16, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.2156$0.39
Output $/Mtok$0.6468$2.34
Coding index37.628.6
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for coding: it scores 37.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.6 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Qwen3.5 397B A17B is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.2156 per million input tokens and $0.6468 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next