Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Summarize

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
16.6
Output $/M
$0.41
S SummarizeScaledown
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 164K vs 1M context window. Summarize fits 6.1x more.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
0
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
57
Summarize only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Summarize not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Summarize Free per million output tokens.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Summarize 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev1272Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1281Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: expert1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: math1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1433Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: science1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1468Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
Design Arena: websites1179Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1167Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1144Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1171Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
DTBench87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1401Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: German1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Korean1372Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: French1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Russian1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Polish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1418Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0000Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0020Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Summarize$0.0080Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Summarize
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpScaleDown Summarize
MakerDeepSeekScaledown
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025October 13, 2026
Context window164K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.04
Output $/Mtok$0.41Free
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Summarize for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Summarize?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Summarize costs $0.04 and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Summarize?

Summarize, with 1M tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Summarize comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Summarize's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next