Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Mistral Small 3

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp leads Mistral Small 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.6 to 6.7, and Mistral Small 3 costs 5.1x less per output token ($0.08 vs $0.41 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
36
Mistral Small 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.08
0
vs boards won of 36 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Mistral Small 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for a larger context window (164K against 33K tokens).

Shared results
36
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
23
Mistral Small 3 only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 57.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 87.7 against Mistral Small 3 4.3, 83.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Mistral Small 3 $0.08 per million output tokens, 5.1x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Mistral Small 3 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsMistral Small 3Ties
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Math40
Knowledge50
General170
All shared boards360
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev1272Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%25.2%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding14381246DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: software and IT14381248DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena WebDev: HTML1281Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.66.7DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%19.6%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%46.2%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%3.8%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291233DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: expert14221202DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441243DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
AA Math Index87.74.3DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%4.3%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: math14221240DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331243DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%65.2%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: science14431235DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681215DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: legal and government14191219DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: business and finance14121205DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
Design Arena: websites1179Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1167Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1144Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1171Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
IFBench54.1%26.4%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%0.0%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DTBench87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251234DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: instruction following14011214DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: creative writing14041194DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: English14411256DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: non-English14041198DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Chinese14611204DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: German14401211DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Japanese13311111DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Korean13721188DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: French14341204DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Russian14121216DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Polish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221217DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: longer queries14181246DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: writing and language14071214DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071184DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0001Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0027Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3$0.011Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Small 3
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Small 3
MakerDeepSeekMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025January 30, 2025
Context window164K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.05
Output $/Mtok$0.41$0.08
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Mistral Small 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for a larger context window (164K against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Mistral Small 3?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3 costs $0.05 and $0.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Mistral Small 3?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, with 164K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Mistral Small 3 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Small 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next