DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash leads DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 41.1 to 16.6, and Ling 3.1 Flash costs 1.8x less per output token ($0.225 vs $0.41 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Ling 3.1 Flash: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 3
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
- 56
- Ling 3.1 Flash only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash leads, 41.1 against 16.6.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has a Design Arena: websites result, 1178.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash takes 262K tokens against 164K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.0005, Ling 3.1 Flash $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Ling 3.1 Flash not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 24.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- AA Intelligence Index: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 16.6 against Ling 3.1 Flash 41.1, 24.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Ling 3.1 Flash $0.225 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Ling 3.1 Flash 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Bars | Ling 3.1 Flash | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 3 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 74.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1272 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 54.1% | Only Ling 3.1 Flash measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 31.1% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| WeirdML | 39.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1438 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1438 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1281 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 16.6 | 41.1 | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.9 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 33.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| TheAgentCompany | 42.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | 56.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 79.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 14.9% | 39.4% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1429 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1422 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1444 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 87.7 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1422 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1433 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 85.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1443 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1468 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1419 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1412 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1178 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1164 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1144 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1152 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1148 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1170 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1031 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 54.1% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 72.3% | 83.0% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| DTBench | 87.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMCA | 29.1% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| CL-bench | 13.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| CL-bench Life | 9.5% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text | 1425 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1401 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1404 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1441 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1404 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1461 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1440 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1331 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1372 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1434 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1441 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1412 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1435 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1422 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1418 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1407 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1407 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | Ling 3.1 Flash | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V3.2 Exp | inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | inclusionAI |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 29, 2025 | October 2, 2026 |
| Context window | 164K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.27 | $0.075 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.41 | $0.225 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Ling 3.1 Flash for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Ling 3.1 Flash?
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0.075 and $0.225. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Ling 3.1 Flash?
Ling 3.1 Flash, with 262K tokens against 164K.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Ling 3.1 Flash comparison based on?
3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Ling 3.1 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.