Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Granite 4.2 8B

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp leads Granite 4.2 8B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.6 to 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B costs 2.0x less per output token ($0.20 vs $0.41 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
24
Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
vs boards won of 24 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Granite 4.2 8B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

Shared results
24
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
36
Granite 4.2 8B only
3
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 20.2 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: creative writing: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 1404 against Granite 4.2 8B 1236, 28.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Granite 4.2 8B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsGranite 4.2 8BTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning50
Knowledge40
General120
All shared boards240
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev1272Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.4Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
SciCodeNot measured31.5%Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding14381378DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: software and IT14381367DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena WebDev: HTML1281Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.611.1DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%63.1%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%9.7%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291327DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: expert14221386DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441345DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: math1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1433Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
MathArena14.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: science14431336DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681336DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: legal and government14191327DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: business and finance14121322DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
Design Arena: websites1179Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1143Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1170Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1031Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index120
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%45.0%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DTBench87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251319DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: instruction following14011300DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: creative writing14041236DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: English14411337DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: non-English14041301DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Chinese14611367DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: German1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Korean1372Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: French1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Russian14121282DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Polish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221301DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: longer queries14181325DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: writing and language14071269DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071271DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGranite 4.2 8BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Granite 4.2 8B
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpIBM Granite 4.2 8B
MakerDeepSeekIBM Granite
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025August 31, 2026
Context window164K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.08
Output $/Mtok$0.41$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Granite 4.2 8B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Granite 4.2 8B?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Granite 4.2 8B?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, with 164K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Granite 4.2 8B comparison based on?

24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Granite 4.2 8B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next