Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp leads GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.6 to 7.3, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 36.6x less per output token ($0.41 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
33
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
0
vs boards won of 33 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-4o (2024-05-13): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 36.6x cheaper ($0.41 vs $15.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
33
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
27
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
11
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 30.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 78.9% against GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 33.4%, 45.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 per million output tokens, 36.6x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ties
Coding30
Intelligence10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge50
General170
All shared boards330
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev1272Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured24.2Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%33.4%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding14381297DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: software and IT14381297DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena WebDev: HTML1281Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.67.3DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
METR time horizonsNot measured40.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROGNot measured32.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured50.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%52.6%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%1.8%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured48.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291281DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: expert14221250DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441293DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 5Not measured51.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math14221284DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331284DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
MathArena14.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%74.0%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
MMLUNot measured84.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science14431295DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681278DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: legal and government14191314DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: business and finance14121262DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
Design Arena: websites1179Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1143Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1170Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1031Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
DTBench87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251300DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: instruction following14011278DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: creative writing14041291DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena VisionNot measured1137Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: English14411312DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: non-English14041283DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Chinese14611277DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: German14401283DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Japanese13311257DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Korean13721234DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: French14341304DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Spanish14411292DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Russian14121285DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Polish14351365DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221302DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: longer queries14181288DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: writing and language14071298DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071289DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1147Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1132Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025May 13, 2024
Context window164K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$5.00
Output $/Mtok$0.41$15.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 36.6x cheaper ($0.41 vs $15.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13) comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next