Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GLM 5V Turbo

GLM 5V Turbo leads DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 16.6, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 9.8x less per output token ($0.41 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 43 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
5
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
38
vs boards won of 43 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GLM 5V Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 9.8x cheaper ($0.41 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
43
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
17
GLM 5V Turbo only
22
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 64.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 33.9% against GLM 5V Turbo 98.5%, 64.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 9.8x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsGLM 5V TurboTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge13
Web design07
General414
All shared boards538
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev12721402GLM 5V Turbo
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%32.6%GLM 5V Turbo
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding14381466GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14381460GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1386Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12811356GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1425Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.623.5GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1124Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1149Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1134Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1267Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured957Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1102Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1060Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1126Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%98.5%GLM 5V Turbo
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%80.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%17.1%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14221453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441456GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1286Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1273Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: math14221442GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331447GLM 5V Turbo
MathArena14.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: science14431448GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681433DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: legal and government14191436GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14121435GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites11791230GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components11641210GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev11431218GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz11521202GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D11481208GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories11701227GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG10311150GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1116Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index414
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
IFBench54.1%61.1%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%70.3%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DTBench87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251437GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14011423GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14041417GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena VisionNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English14411454GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14041420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14611491GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14401422DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Korean13721397GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14341443GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14411452GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14121432GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14351432DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221431GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14181438GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14071420GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071407DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1274Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1329Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1270Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1268Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1264Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1241Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1252Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1416Only GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGLM 5V TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GLM 5V Turbo
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpZ.ai GLM 5V Turbo
MakerDeepSeekZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025April 1, 2026
Context window164K203K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$1.20
Output $/Mtok$0.41$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 9.8x cheaper ($0.41 vs $4.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GLM 5V Turbo?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GLM 5V Turbo?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next