Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 7.3x less per output token than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ($0.41 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
vs $0.41 vs $3.00 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is 7.3x cheaper.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 7.3x cheaper ($0.41 vs $3.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has results on Aider polyglot, LMArena WebDev and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run); Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on LMArena Image Edit. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) $3.00 per million output tokens, 7.3x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev1272Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1281Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.6Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: expert1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: math1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1433Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: science1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1468Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
Design Arena: websites1179Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1167Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1144Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1171Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
DTBench87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1401Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: German1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Korean1372Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: French1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Russian1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Polish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1418Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Leader
LMArena Image EditNot measured1387Only Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.0020Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.034Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)$0.130Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGoogle Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025June 18, 2026
Context window164K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.50
Output $/Mtok$0.41$3.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 7.3x cheaper ($0.41 vs $3.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.50 and $3.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, with 164K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp has results on Aider polyglot, LMArena WebDev and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run); Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) on LMArena Image Edit. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next