DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus leads Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 14.8 to 6.7, at about the same output price ($1.0142 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 24 benchmarks have a result for both.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for a larger context window (164K against 33K tokens).
- Shared results
- 24
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus only
- 21
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
- 11
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus leads, 14.8 against 6.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a AA Agentic Index result, 6.8.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a Design Arena: websites result, 1187.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $0.0008, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $0.0012 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Knowledge, 34.4 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 79.8% against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 29.5%, 50.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus $1.0142 against Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus takes 164K tokens, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 33K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Bars | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 3 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 4 | 0 | ||
| Math | 1 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 5 | 0 | ||
| General | 10 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 24 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 16.4% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 47.0% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| AA Coding Index | 43.5 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 79.8% | 29.5% | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| SciCode | 38.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 31.8% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| ALE-Bench | 745.2 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1425 | 1276 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1426 | 1261 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 14.8 | 6.7 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 119.5 | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 6.8 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 37.1% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 79.2% | 41.7% | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 16.4% | 3.5% | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1426 | 1251 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1221 | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1432 | 1269 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 89.7 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 89.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| GSM8K | Not measured | 93.0% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1402 | 1251 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1243 | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 85.1% | 63.5% | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| MMLU | Not measured | 79.1% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| AI2 Reasoning Challenge | Not measured | 70.5% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1451 | 1221 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1468 | 1187 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1457 | 1257 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1414 | 1224 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1187 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1182 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1131 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1167 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1141 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1175 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1065 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index100
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 57.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 69.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| DTBench | 81.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| LMCA | 28.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| HellaSwag | Not measured | 83.0% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| WinoGrande | Not measured | 80.8% | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1230 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1404 | 1223 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1403 | 1174 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: English | 1429 | 1248 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1408 | 1205 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1222 | Only Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1435 | 1228 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1427 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1411 | 1222 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1422 | 1251 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1409 | 1191 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1391 | 1150 | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | September 22, 2025 | November 11, 2024 |
| Context window | 164K | 33K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.3063 | $0.66 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.0142 | $1.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus for a larger context window (164K against 33K tokens).
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs $0.3063 per million input tokens and $1.0142 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus, with 164K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct comparison based on?
24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.