LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Updated October 21, 2026. 4 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V3DeepSeek
Coding
70.2
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.0287
0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BQwen
Coding
7.7
Overall
19.3
Output $/M
$1.00
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Decision reading

DeepSeek V3 scores 70.2 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B when output tokens cost 1.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 262K against 164K tokens.

Shared results
4
DeepSeek V3 only
9
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B only
41
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3 70.2 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7.7 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 21.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: DeepSeek V3 48.9% against Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 70.0%, 21.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3 $1.0287 against Qwen3.5-35B-A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3BarsQwen3.5-35B-A3BTies
Reasoning01
Math01
General02
All shared boards04
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
Aider polyglot70.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
SWE-bench Lite30.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1254Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.5%Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured221.8Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1410Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1415Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1238Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1301Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured19.3Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured142.5Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured89.2%Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$463Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.5%Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured21.0%Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)71.2%83.5%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1408Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1411Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME48.9%70.0%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1404Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1410Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1413Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1421Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1399Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1394Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1120Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1093Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1054Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1089Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1087Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1108Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Design Arena: SVG976Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured72.5%Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
DTBench62.7%80.0%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMCA15.2%29.5%Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
LMArena TextNot measured1395Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1379Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1347Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1407Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1378Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1457Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1367Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1326Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1355Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1412Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1390Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1376Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1385Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1390Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1389Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1365Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1347Only Qwen3.5-35B-A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.016Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.010Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3$0.062Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B$0.038Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
SpecificationDeepSeek V3Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 26, 2024February 25, 2026
Context window164K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.2574$0.14
Output $/Mtok$1.0287$1.00
Coding index70.27.7
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3 better than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B for coding?

DeepSeek V3 scores 70.2 and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7.7 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B when output tokens cost 1.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 262K against 164K tokens.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

DeepSeek V3 costs $0.2574 per million input tokens and $1.0287 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-35B-A3B costs $0.14 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3 or Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, with 262K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next