Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R (08-2024) vs o3 Pro

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command R (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
o3 ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
21.9
Output $/M
$80.00
vs $0.60 vs $80.00 per 1M output tokens. Command R (08-2024) is 133.3x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command R (08-2024) has the edge where output tokens cost 133.3x less.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; o3 Pro on Aider polyglot, WeirdML and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R (08-2024) not benchmarked, o3 Pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command R (08-2024) $0.60 against o3 Pro $80.00 per million output tokens, 133.3x apart.
Context window
Command R (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, o3 Pro 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o3 ProLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured84.9%Only o3 Pro measured
WeirdMLNot measured58.2%Only o3 Pro measured
LMArena Text: coding1187Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o3 ProLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured21.9Only o3 Pro measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured147.3Only o3 Pro measured
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o3 ProLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.5%Only o3 Pro measured
ARC-AGINot measured59.3%Only o3 Pro measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured4.9%Only o3 Pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1186Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: expert1173Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1194Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o3 ProLeader
LMArena Text: math1188Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1198Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o3 ProLeader
LMArena Text: science1252Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1268Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1215Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command R (08-2024) and o3 Pro
BenchmarkCommand R (08-2024)o3 ProLeader
DTBenchNot measured86.9%Only o3 Pro measured
LMCANot measured38.5%Only o3 Pro measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured97.2%Only o3 Pro measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured84.4%Only o3 Pro measured
LMArena Text1229Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1197Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1234Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: English1238Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: German1216Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1166Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1162Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1227Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1213Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1230Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1241Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1223Not measuredOnly Command R (08-2024) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0004Fits in one request
o3 Pro$0.060Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.0093Fits in one request
o3 Pro$1.24Fits in one request

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R (08-2024)$0.036Exceeds the context window
o3 Pro$4.80Exceeds the context window

Command R (08-2024) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R (08-2024) and o3 Pro
SpecificationCohere Command R (08-2024)OpenAI o3 Pro
MakerCohereOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024June 10, 2025
Context window128K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$20.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$80.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R (08-2024) better than o3 Pro for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command R (08-2024) has the edge where output tokens cost 133.3x less.

Which is cheaper, Command R (08-2024) or o3 Pro?

Command R (08-2024) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; o3 Pro costs $20.00 and $80.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R (08-2024) or o3 Pro?

o3 Pro, with 200K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command R (08-2024) and o3 Pro?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R (08-2024) has results on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and LMArena Text: hard prompts; o3 Pro on Aider polyglot, WeirdML and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next