Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A+ vs DeepSeek V3.2 Exp

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
16.6
Output $/M
$0.41
vs $1.50 vs $0.41 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp is 3.7x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A+ has the edge where the context window is larger, 192K against 164K tokens.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command A+ has none yet; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on Aider polyglot, LMArena WebDev and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A+ not benchmarked, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command A+ $1.50 against DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 per million output tokens, 3.7x apart.
Context window
Command A+ takes 192K tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 164K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
BenchmarkCommand A+DeepSeek V3.2 ExpLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured74.2%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1272Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.9%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.1%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdMLNot measured39.5%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1438Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1438Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1281Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
BenchmarkCommand A+DeepSeek V3.2 ExpLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured16.6Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured144.9Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
BenchmarkCommand A+DeepSeek V3.2 ExpLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured33.9%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
TheAgentCompanyNot measured42.9%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
BenchmarkCommand A+DeepSeek V3.2 ExpLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.7%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.9%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1429Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1422Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1444Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
BenchmarkCommand A+DeepSeek V3.2 ExpLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured87.7Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.7%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1422Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1433Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
BenchmarkCommand A+DeepSeek V3.2 ExpLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.0%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1443Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1468Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1419Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1412Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
BenchmarkCommand A+DeepSeek V3.2 ExpLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1179Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1167Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1144Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1152Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1148Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1171Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1032Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
BenchmarkCommand A+DeepSeek V3.2 ExpLeader
IFBenchNot measured54.1%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured72.3%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
DTBenchNot measured87.7%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCANot measured29.1%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured83.3%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-benchNot measured13.2%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured9.5%Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena TextNot measured1425Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1401Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1404Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1441Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1404Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1461Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1440Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1331Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1372Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1434Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1412Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1435Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1422Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1418Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1407Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1407Only DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
SpecificationCohere Command A+DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
MakerCohereDeepSeek
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026September 29, 2025
Context window192K164K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.27
Output $/Mtok$1.50$0.41
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A+ has the edge where the context window is larger, 192K against 164K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or DeepSeek V3.2 Exp?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 and $0.41. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or DeepSeek V3.2 Exp?

Command A+, with 192K tokens against 164K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command A+ and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command A+ has none yet; DeepSeek V3.2 Exp on Aider polyglot, LMArena WebDev and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next