Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Seed-2.0-Lite vs Mistral Medium 3

Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3 cost about the same per output token ($2.00 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Seed-2.0-LiteByteDance Seed
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
Mistral Medium 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
vs $2.00 vs $2.00 per 1M output tokens. About the same price.

Seed-2.0-Lite or Mistral Medium 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Seed-2.0-Lite for a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Lite has none yet; Mistral Medium 3 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Seed-2.0-Lite not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Both cost $2.00 per million output tokens.
Context window
Seed-2.0-Lite takes 262K tokens, Mistral Medium 3 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.0%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.0Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured134.0Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured24.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.8%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.1%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1364Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1342Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1155Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured30.3Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1353Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1354Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.0%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1381Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1381Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1352Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1079Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1022Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1017Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1034Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1083Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1068Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28 boards measured
General benchmarks for Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
BenchmarkSeed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3Leader
IFBenchNot measured39.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured31.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
DTBenchNot measured62.3%Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1370Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1338Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1343Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1157Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1385Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1353Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1374Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1377Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1316Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1304Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1368Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1364Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1359Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1371Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1384Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1360Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1352Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1335Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1161Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1154Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1094Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1141Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1146Only Mistral Medium 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Seed-2.0-Lite$0.0013Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.0014Fits in one request

Seed-2.0-Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Lite$0.018Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.026Fits in one request

Seed-2.0-Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Seed-2.0-Lite$0.070Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3$0.100Exceeds the context window

Seed-2.0-Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3
SpecificationByteDance Seed Seed-2.0-LiteMistral Medium 3
MakerByteDance SeedMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 10, 2026May 7, 2025
Context window262K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.40
Output $/Mtok$2.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Seed-2.0-Lite better than Mistral Medium 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Seed-2.0-Lite for a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Seed-2.0-Lite or Mistral Medium 3?

Seed-2.0-Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Seed-2.0-Lite or Mistral Medium 3?

Seed-2.0-Lite, with 262K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Seed-2.0-Lite and Mistral Medium 3?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Seed-2.0-Lite has none yet; Mistral Medium 3 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next