Nova Pro 1.0 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Updated October 21, 2026. 29 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 29
- Nova Pro 1.0 only
- 13
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 only
- 19
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads, 24.4 against 7.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has a AA Agentic Index result, 26.3.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads, 1208 against 796.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes 1.05M tokens against 300K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Nova Pro 1.0 $0.0024, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nova Pro 1.0 not benchmarked, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Web design, 51.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: websites: Nova Pro 1.0 796 against DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 1208, 51.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nova Pro 1.0 $3.20 against DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.28 per million output tokens, 11.4x apart.
- Context window
- Nova Pro 1.0 takes 300K tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nova Pro 1.0 | Bars | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 0 | 16 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 29 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | Not measured | 1582 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 52.0 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.3% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 6.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 45.6% | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| ALE-Bench | Not measured | 678.2 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1270 | 1457 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1271 | 1453 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | Not measured | 1585 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | Not measured | 1558 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 7.0 | 24.4 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 146.1 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 26.3 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 14.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 49.9% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 3.2% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 46.3% | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1246 | 1444 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1211 | 1441 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1259 | 1449 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 7.0 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 7.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1252 | 1426 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1261 | 1432 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 69.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| MMLU | 82.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1255 | 1446 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1260 | 1448 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1281 | 1439 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1229 | 1425 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 796 | 1208 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: UI components | Not measured | 1165 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1197 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | Not measured | 1127 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1189 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1205 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1155 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1109 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 38.1% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 21.0% | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 86.4% | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 35.9% | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1432 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1235 | 1421 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1212 | 1403 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Vision | 980 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1276 | 1441 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1233 | 1419 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1244 | 1463 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1243 | 1419 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1200 | 1389 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1203 | 1383 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1271 | 1439 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1182 | 1436 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1240 | 1427 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1436 | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1246 | 1449 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1255 | 1434 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1247 | 1410 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1210 | 1400 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Vision: English | 987 | Not measured | Only Nova Pro 1.0 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Amazon Nova Pro 1.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | December 5, 2024 | April 24, 2026 |
| Context window | 300K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.80 | $0.14 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.20 | $0.28 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nova Pro 1.0 better than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Pro 1.0 has the edge where what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Nova Pro 1.0 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?
Nova Pro 1.0 costs $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.14 and $0.28. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Nova Pro 1.0 or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks is the Nova Pro 1.0 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 comparison based on?
29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Pro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.