Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Premier 1.0 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

Nova Premier 1.0 leads GPT-3.5 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 5.5, and GPT-3.5 Turbo costs 8.3x less per output token ($1.50 vs $12.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Premier 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$12.50
3
GPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Nova Premier 1.0 or GPT-3.5 Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for a larger context window (1M against 16K tokens).

Shared results
3
Nova Premier 1.0 only
11
GPT-3.5 Turbo only
10
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Premier 1.0 not benchmarked, GPT-3.5 Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 27.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Nova Premier 1.0 56.9% against GPT-3.5 Turbo 29.7%, 27.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Premier 1.0 $12.50 against GPT-3.5 Turbo $1.50 per million output tokens, 8.3x apart.
Context window
Nova Premier 1.0 takes 1M tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Premier 1.0BarsGPT-3.5 TurboTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
Knowledge10
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured10.7Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
ALE-Bench147.4Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured0.0%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.25.5Nova Premier 1.0
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom38.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured30.6%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)56.9%29.7%Nova Premier 1.0
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured61.6%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark44.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
AA Math Index17.3Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)17.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
GSM8KNot measured57.8%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.4%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured58.5%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%46.2%Nova Premier 1.0
MMLUNot measured68.5%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Design Arena: websites835Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
IFBench36.2%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)34.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
DTBenchNot measured48.5%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
LMCANot measured9.7%Only GPT-3.5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0GPT-3.5 TurboLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.0088Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.0013Fits in one request

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.163Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.029Exceeds the context window

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.625Fits in one request
GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.115Exceeds the context window

GPT-3.5 Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Premier 1.0 and GPT-3.5 Turbo
SpecificationAmazon Nova Premier 1.0OpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo
MakerAmazonOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 31, 2025May 28, 2023
Context window1M16K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.50
Output $/Mtok$12.50$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than GPT-3.5 Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for a larger context window (1M against 16K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or GPT-3.5 Turbo?

Nova Premier 1.0 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $12.50 per million output tokens; GPT-3.5 Turbo costs $0.50 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Premier 1.0 or GPT-3.5 Turbo?

Nova Premier 1.0, with 1M tokens against 16K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Premier 1.0 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova Premier 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-3.5 Turbo's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next