Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B leads Nova 2 Lite on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.4 to 13.4, at about the same output price ($2.70 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova 2 LiteAmazon
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Qwen3.6 27BQwen
Coding
36.8
Overall
45.3
Output $/M
$2.70
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3.6 27B: which to pick

Only Qwen3.6 27B has a coding score, 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova 2 Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova 2 Lite for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($2.50 vs $2.70 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
2
Nova 2 Lite only
29
Qwen3.6 27B only
22
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova 2 Lite not benchmarked, Qwen3.6 27B 36.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 30.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Nova 2 Lite 23.0 against Qwen3.6 27B 53.7, 30.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova 2 Lite $2.50 against Qwen3.6 27B $2.70 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Nova 2 Lite takes 1M tokens, Qwen3.6 27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova 2 LiteBarsQwen3.6 27BTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
All shared boards02
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Coding Index23.053.7Qwen3.6 27B
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured11.9%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
SciCodeNot measured42.8%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.8%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
ALE-Bench236.3Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: coding1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1394Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.421.4Qwen3.6 27B
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.2Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured18.5Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured85.9%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured7.0%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1364Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: expert1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured91.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured35.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text: math1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1369Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured53.2%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured62.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text: science1382Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1386Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1369Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
IFBenchNot measured67.6%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.3%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
DTBenchNot measured78.1%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMCANot measured34.5%Only Qwen3.6 27B measured
LMArena Text1362Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1335Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1292Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: English1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: non-English1337Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1364Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: German1343Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1273Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Korean1281Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: French1381Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1375Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Russian1342Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Polish1327Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1338Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1335Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1318Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1309Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.0018Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.031Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 27B$0.117Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova 2 Lite and Qwen3.6 27B
SpecificationAmazon Nova 2 LiteQwen3.6 27B
MakerAmazonQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.45
Output $/Mtok$2.50$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked36.8
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.30
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Qwen3.6 27B for coding?

Only Qwen3.6 27B has a coding score, 36.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova 2 Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova 2 Lite for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($2.50 vs $2.70 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3.6 27B?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.45 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.6 27B only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Qwen3.6 27B?

Nova 2 Lite, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova 2 Lite vs Qwen3.6 27B comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nova 2 Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 27B's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next