Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Aion-3.0 vs Gemma 3 27B

Gemma 3 27B costs 20.0x less per output token than Aion-3.0 ($0.30 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

A Aion-3.0Aion Labs
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
Gemma 3 27BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
31.4
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $6.00 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Gemma 3 27B is 20.0x cheaper.

Aion-3.0 or Gemma 3 27B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion-3.0 has none yet; Gemma 3 27B on Aider polyglot, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Aion-3.0 not benchmarked, Gemma 3 27B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Aion-3.0 $6.00 against Gemma 3 27B $0.30 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 131K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkAion-3.0Gemma 3 27BLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured4.9%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured10.1Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.7%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
SciCodeNot measured23.3%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1322Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1354Only Gemma 3 27B measured
SciCodeNot measured0.0%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkAion-3.0Gemma 3 27BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured4.9Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured130.0Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkAion-3.0Gemma 3 27BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.1Only Gemma 3 27B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured10.5%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured29.5%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkAion-3.0Gemma 3 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.8%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.4%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured47.7%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1340Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1304Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1353Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1156Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1160Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured35.1%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkAion-3.0Gemma 3 27BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured20.7Only Gemma 3 27B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured20.7%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured22.5%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
MATH level 5Not measured74.0%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1312Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1327Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkAion-3.0Gemma 3 27BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.9%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
GeoBenchNot measured52.0%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1383Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1391Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1375Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1360Only Gemma 3 27B measured
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured29.1%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31 boards measured
General benchmarks for Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B
BenchmarkAion-3.0Gemma 3 27BLeader
IFBenchNot measured31.8%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured7.3%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
DTBenchNot measured52.5%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMCANot measured12.3%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured33.3%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured79.9%Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1358Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1321Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1345Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1165Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1377Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1334Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1346Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1362Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1287Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1308Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1368Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1349Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1349Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1345Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1345Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1333Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1347Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1320Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1188Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1164Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1156Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1166Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1151Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1196Only Gemma 3 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1177Only Gemma 3 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Aion-3.0$0.0060Fits in one request
Gemma 3 27B$0.0002Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Aion-3.0$0.168Fits in one request
Gemma 3 27B$0.0049Fits in one request

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Aion-3.0$0.660Exceeds the context window
Gemma 3 27B$0.019Exceeds the context window

Gemma 3 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B
SpecificationAionLabs Aion-3.0Google Gemma 3 27B
MakerAion LabsGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 7, 2026March 12, 2025
Context window131K131K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.08
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Aion-3.0 better than Gemma 3 27B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Aion-3.0 or Gemma 3 27B?

Aion-3.0 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Gemma 3 27B costs $0.08 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Aion-3.0 or Gemma 3 27B?

Neither: both take 131K tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Aion-3.0 and Gemma 3 27B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Aion-3.0 has none yet; Gemma 3 27B on Aider polyglot, AA Coding Index and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next