Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

ArtifactsBench leaderboard

As of November 6, 2026, among the results listed here, inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash has the highest reported ArtifactsBench score, 77, published by inclusionAI, ahead of MiniMax M2 at 66.8. 3 models have a ArtifactsBench result in our records.

Scores as the model makers published them, not re-run by us; each row links to its announcement.

Best reported score

77

inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash

Reported by inclusionAI, July 23, 2026

Runner-up

66.8

MiniMax M2

Reported by MiniMax, October 23, 2025

3 models ranked · 2 makers

Reported ArtifactsBench scores

ArtifactsBench scores reported by model makers
Rank Model Score Setting Reported by Date
1 Ling 3.0 Flash 77 Not published inclusionAI July 23, 2026 (model release) · read from the maker's chart
2 MiniMax M2Retired 66.8 Not published MiniMax October 23, 2025 (model release)
3 Ling 3.0 Tiny 47.9 Thinking inclusionAI August 6, 2026 (model release) · read from the maker's chart

How much to trust these numbers

Source
Reported by the model makers themselves. Not re-run by LLMBenchmark or anyone independent.
Settings
Settings differ between makers. Check the Setting column before comparing two scores.
Spread
77 to 47.9 across 3 models.
Freshness
Newest result published August 6, 2026; oldest October 23, 2025.
Charts
Some values were read from charts in the announcements. Two independent readings had to match exactly.

What ArtifactsBench measures

ArtifactsBench asks models to generate code for visual artifacts, and its score reflects the visual and interactive quality of the resulting outputs. Source: ArtifactsBench: Bridging the Visual-Interactive Gap in LLM Code Generation