Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs 29.0x less per output token than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ($0.30 vs $8.70 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.30
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $8.70
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for output tokens 29.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $8.70 per million).
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed takes 1.05M tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.0003, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $0.0087 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.30 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $8.70 per million output tokens, 29.0x apart.
- Context window
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 takes 33K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Mistral Voxtral Small 24B 2507 | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | October 30, 2025 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $4.35 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.30 | $8.70 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Voxtral Small 24B 2507 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for output tokens 29.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $8.70 per million).
Which is cheaper, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $4.35 and $8.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.
Has any benchmark tested both Voxtral Small 24B 2507 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.