UnslopNemo 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
UnslopNemo 12B costs 21.7x less per output token than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ($0.40 vs $8.70 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.40
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $8.70
UnslopNemo 12B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick UnslopNemo 12B for output tokens 21.7x cheaper ($0.40 vs $8.70 per million).
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed takes 1.05M tokens against 1.02M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B
UnslopNemo 12B $0.0006, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $0.0087 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- UnslopNemo 12B not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- UnslopNemo 12B $0.40 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $8.70 per million output tokens, 21.7x apart.
- Context window
- UnslopNemo 12B takes 1.02M tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | TheDrummer UnslopNemo 12B | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | TheDrummer | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 8, 2024 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.02M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.40 | $4.35 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.40 | $8.70 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is UnslopNemo 12B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick UnslopNemo 12B for output tokens 21.7x cheaper ($0.40 vs $8.70 per million).
Which is cheaper, UnslopNemo 12B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
UnslopNemo 12B costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $4.35 and $8.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, UnslopNemo 12B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed, with 1.05M tokens against 1.02M.
Has any benchmark tested both UnslopNemo 12B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.