Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Step 3.5 Flash vs Skyfall 36B V2

Step 3.5 Flash costs 2.7x less per output token than Skyfall 36B V2 ($0.30 vs $0.80 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Step 3.5 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
T Skyfall 36B V2TheDrummer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
vs $0.30 vs $0.80 per 1M output tokens. Step 3.5 Flash is 2.7x cheaper.

Step 3.5 Flash or Skyfall 36B V2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Step 3.5 Flash for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.30 vs $0.80 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 33K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Step 3.5 Flash has results on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT; Skyfall 36B V2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Step 3.5 Flash not benchmarked, Skyfall 36B V2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Step 3.5 Flash $0.30 against Skyfall 36B V2 $0.80 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Step 3.5 Flash takes 262K tokens, Skyfall 36B V2 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2
BenchmarkStep 3.5 FlashSkyfall 36B V2Leader
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1436Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1434Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2
BenchmarkStep 3.5 FlashSkyfall 36B V2Leader
AA Intelligence Index17.0Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2
BenchmarkStep 3.5 FlashSkyfall 36B V2Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom94.4%Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2
BenchmarkStep 3.5 FlashSkyfall 36B V2Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.1%Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.5%Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1411Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expert1421Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1421Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2
BenchmarkStep 3.5 FlashSkyfall 36B V2Leader
LMArena Text: math1408Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1421Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2
BenchmarkStep 3.5 FlashSkyfall 36B V2Leader
LMArena Text: science1415Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1408Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1408Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1394Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2
BenchmarkStep 3.5 FlashSkyfall 36B V2Leader
IFBench66.5%Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)63.0%Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text1403Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1385Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1357Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: English1417Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-English1385Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1446Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: German1405Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1353Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Korean1351Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: French1421Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1419Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Russian1385Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: Polish1389Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1404Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1402Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1372Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1360Not measuredOnly Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Step 3.5 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
Skyfall 36B V2$0.0009Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Step 3.5 Flash$0.0059Fits in one request
Skyfall 36B V2$0.030Exceeds the context window

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Step 3.5 Flash$0.023Fits in one request
Skyfall 36B V2$0.118Exceeds the context window

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2
SpecificationStepFun Step 3.5 FlashTheDrummer Skyfall 36B V2
MakerStepFunTheDrummer
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 29, 2026March 10, 2025
Context window262K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.55
Output $/Mtok$0.30$0.80
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Step 3.5 Flash better than Skyfall 36B V2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Step 3.5 Flash for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.30 vs $0.80 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Step 3.5 Flash or Skyfall 36B V2?

Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Skyfall 36B V2 costs $0.55 and $0.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Step 3.5 Flash or Skyfall 36B V2?

Step 3.5 Flash, with 262K tokens against 33K.

Has any benchmark tested both Step 3.5 Flash and Skyfall 36B V2?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Step 3.5 Flash has results on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT; Skyfall 36B V2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next