Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Extract vs Solar Mini 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

S ExtractScaledown
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
24.1
Output $/M
$0.20
vs 1M vs 524K context window. Extract fits 1.9x more.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Extract has the edge where the context window is larger, 1M against 524K tokens.

Shared results
0
Extract only
0
Solar Mini 4 only
7
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Extract not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Extract Free against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens.
Context window
Extract takes 1M tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured24.1Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured25.8%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1160Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1113Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1153Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
General benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Extract and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkExtractSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Extract$0.0000Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Extract$0.0020Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Extract$0.0080Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Extract and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationScaleDown ExtractUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerScaledownUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 13, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window1M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.04$0.05
Output $/MtokFree$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Extract better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Extract has the edge where the context window is larger, 1M against 524K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Extract or Solar Mini 4?

Extract costs $0.04 per million input tokens and Free per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Extract or Solar Mini 4?

Extract, with 1M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the Extract vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Extract's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next