Fugu Ultra vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs 100.0x less per output token than Fugu Ultra ($0.30 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $30.00
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.30
Fugu Ultra or Voxtral Small 24B 2507: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Fugu Ultra for a larger context window (1M against 33K tokens).
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Fugu Ultra
Fugu Ultra takes 1M tokens against 33K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Fugu Ultra $0.020, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Fugu Ultra not benchmarked, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Fugu Ultra $30.00 against Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 100.0x apart.
- Context window
- Fugu Ultra takes 1M tokens, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 33K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Sakana Fugu Ultra | Mistral Voxtral Small 24B 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Sakana | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | June 24, 2026 | October 30, 2025 |
| Context window | 1M | 33K |
| Input $/Mtok | $5.00 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $30.00 | $0.30 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Fugu Ultra better than Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Fugu Ultra for a larger context window (1M against 33K tokens).
Which is cheaper, Fugu Ultra or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Fugu Ultra costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $30.00 per million output tokens; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Fugu Ultra or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Fugu Ultra, with 1M tokens against 33K.
Has any benchmark tested both Fugu Ultra and Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.