Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Relace Search vs Summarize

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace Relace Search Replace Summarize
Relace SearchRelace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
S SummarizeScaledown
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 256K vs 1M context window. Summarize fits 3.9x more.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Model ARelace SearchRelaceNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BSummarizeScaledownNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
0
Relace Search only
0
Summarize only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Relace Search not benchmarked, Summarize not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Relace Search $3.00 against Summarize Free per million output tokens.
Context window
Relace Search takes 256K tokens, Summarize 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingNot comparableSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index0 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 38 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 21 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 17 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Relace Search and Summarize
BenchmarkRelace SearchSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Relace Search$0.0025Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0000Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Relace Search$0.059Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0020Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Relace Search$0.230Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0080Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Relace Search and Summarize
SpecificationRelace SearchScaleDown Summarize
MakerRelaceScaledown
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 8, 2025October 13, 2026
Context window256K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.04
Output $/Mtok$3.00Free
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Relace Search better than Summarize for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Relace Search or Summarize?

Relace Search costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Summarize costs $0.04 and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Relace Search or Summarize?

Summarize, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks is the Relace Search vs Summarize comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Relace Search's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Summarize's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next